From ce2478c89f21811029097c6bc06455ca69d42214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Benjamin Berg <bberg@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:31:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix missing initialization

Seems like the compiler on ppc64 will sometimes report this as a missing
initialization. Technically this is not true, as the variable will
always be initialized before the scope is left. But, lets make the
compiler happy about this.
---
 examples/verify.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/examples/verify.c b/examples/verify.c
index 89a9b2c..4e1c988 100644
--- a/examples/verify.c
+++ b/examples/verify.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ start_verification (FpDevice *dev, VerifyData *verify_data)
     {
       g_print ("Loading previously enrolled %s finger data...\n",
                finger_to_string (verify_data->finger));
-      g_autoptr(FpPrint) verify_print;
+      g_autoptr(FpPrint) verify_print = NULL;
 
       verify_print = print_data_load (dev, verify_data->finger);
 
-- 
2.23.0