Blame SOURCES/0002-Fix-missing-initialization.patch

f36967
From ce2478c89f21811029097c6bc06455ca69d42214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
f36967
From: Benjamin Berg <bberg@redhat.com>
f36967
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:31:29 +0100
f36967
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Fix missing initialization
f36967
f36967
Seems like the compiler on ppc64 will sometimes report this as a missing
f36967
initialization. Technically this is not true, as the variable will
f36967
always be initialized before the scope is left. But, lets make the
f36967
compiler happy about this.
f36967
---
f36967
 examples/verify.c | 2 +-
f36967
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
f36967
f36967
diff --git a/examples/verify.c b/examples/verify.c
f36967
index 89a9b2c..4e1c988 100644
f36967
--- a/examples/verify.c
f36967
+++ b/examples/verify.c
f36967
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ start_verification (FpDevice *dev, VerifyData *verify_data)
f36967
     {
f36967
       g_print ("Loading previously enrolled %s finger data...\n",
f36967
                finger_to_string (verify_data->finger));
f36967
-      g_autoptr(FpPrint) verify_print;
f36967
+      g_autoptr(FpPrint) verify_print = NULL;
f36967
 
f36967
       verify_print = print_data_load (dev, verify_data->finger);
f36967
 
f36967
-- 
f36967
2.23.0
f36967