From b65927de7dd0ac9a52fa9b855cd17860c5303e6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:31:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 22/29] exec: Drop incorrect & dead S390 code in qemu_ram_remap()

RH-Author: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Message-id: <1379496669-22778-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 54426
O-Subject: [PATCH 7.0 qemu-kvm 5/8] exec: Drop incorrect & dead S390 code in qemu_ram_remap()
Bugzilla: 1009328
RH-Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>

From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

Old S390 KVM wants guest RAM mapped in a peculiar way.  Commit 6b02494
implemented that.

When qemu_ram_remap() got added in commit cd19cfa, its code carefully
mimicked the allocation code: peculiar way if defined(TARGET_S390X) &&
defined(CONFIG_KVM), else normal way.

For new S390 KVM, we actually want the normal way.  Commit fdec991
changed qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr() accordingly, but forgot to update
qemu_ram_remap().  If qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr() maps RAM the normal
way, but qemu_ram_remap() remaps it the peculiar way, remapping
changes protection and flags, which it shouldn't.

Fortunately, this can't happen, as we never remap on S390.

Replace the incorrect code with an assertion.

Thanks to Christian Borntraeger for help with assessing the bug's
(non-)impact.

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Message-id: 1375276272-15988-6-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
(cherry picked from commit 2eb9fbaab56c6350c7d137428f4bd0bc79168214)
---
 exec.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
---
 exec.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 42a0005..185155c 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1201,15 +1201,16 @@ void qemu_ram_remap(ram_addr_t addr, ram_addr_t length)
                     area = mmap(vaddr, length, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
                                 flags, block->fd, offset);
                 } else {
-#if defined(TARGET_S390X) && defined(CONFIG_KVM)
-                    flags |= MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
-                    area = mmap(vaddr, length, PROT_EXEC|PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
-                                flags, -1, 0);
-#else
+                    /*
+                     * Remap needs to match alloc.  Accelerators that
+                     * set phys_mem_alloc never remap.  If they did,
+                     * we'd need a remap hook here.
+                     */
+                    assert(phys_mem_alloc == qemu_anon_ram_alloc);
+
                     flags |= MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
                     area = mmap(vaddr, length, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
                                 flags, -1, 0);
-#endif
                 }
                 if (area != vaddr) {
                     fprintf(stderr, "Could not remap addr: "
-- 
1.7.1