From 345107bfd5537b51f34aaeb97d6161858bb6feee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 17:10:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 08/16] coroutine: Revert to constant batch size
RH-Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
RH-MergeRequest: 87: coroutine: Fix crashes due to too large pool batch size
RH-Commit: [2/2] 8a8a39af873854cdc8333d1a70f3479a97c3ec7a (kmwolf/centos-qemu-kvm)
RH-Bugzilla: 2079938
RH-Acked-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Commit 4c41c69e changed the way the coroutine pool is sized because for
virtio-blk devices with a large queue size and heavy I/O, it was just
too small and caused coroutines to be deleted and reallocated soon
afterwards. The change made the size dynamic based on the number of
queues and the queue size of virtio-blk devices.
There are two important numbers here: Slightly simplified, when a
coroutine terminates, it is generally stored in the global release pool
up to a certain pool size, and if the pool is full, it is freed.
Conversely, when allocating a new coroutine, the coroutines in the
release pool are reused if the pool already has reached a certain
minimum size (the batch size), otherwise we allocate new coroutines.
The problem after commit 4c41c69e is that it not only increases the
maximum pool size (which is the intended effect), but also the batch
size for reusing coroutines (which is a bug). It means that in cases
with many devices and/or a large queue size (which defaults to the
number of vcpus for virtio-blk-pci), many thousand coroutines could be
sitting in the release pool without being reused.
This is not only a waste of memory and allocations, but it actually
makes the QEMU process likely to hit the vm.max_map_count limit on Linux
because each coroutine requires two mappings (its stack and the guard
page for the stack), causing it to abort() in qemu_alloc_stack() because
when the limit is hit, mprotect() starts to fail with ENOMEM.
In order to fix the problem, change the batch size back to 64 to avoid
uselessly accumulating coroutines in the release pool, but keep the
dynamic maximum pool size so that coroutines aren't freed too early
in heavy I/O scenarios.
Note that this fix doesn't strictly make it impossible to hit the limit,
but this would only happen if most of the coroutines are actually in use
at the same time, not just sitting in a pool. This is the same behaviour
as we already had before commit 4c41c69e. Fully preventing this would
require allowing qemu_coroutine_create() to return an error, but it
doesn't seem to be a scenario that people hit in practice.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079938
Fixes: 4c41c69e05fe28c0f95f8abd2ebf407e95a4f04b
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220510151020.105528-3-kwolf@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Hiroki Narukawa <hnarukaw@yahoo-corp.jp>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9ec7a59b5aad4b736871c378d30f5ef5ec51cb52)
Conflicts:
util/qemu-coroutine.c
Trivial merge conflict because we don't have commit ac387a08 downstream.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
util/qemu-coroutine.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine.c b/util/qemu-coroutine.c
index faca0ca97c..804f672e0a 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine.c
@@ -20,14 +20,20 @@
#include "qemu/coroutine_int.h"
#include "block/aio.h"
-/** Initial batch size is 64, and is increased on demand */
+/**
+ * The minimal batch size is always 64, coroutines from the release_pool are
+ * reused as soon as there are 64 coroutines in it. The maximum pool size starts
+ * with 64 and is increased on demand so that coroutines are not deleted even if
+ * they are not immediately reused.
+ */
enum {
- POOL_INITIAL_BATCH_SIZE = 64,
+ POOL_MIN_BATCH_SIZE = 64,
+ POOL_INITIAL_MAX_SIZE = 64,
};
/** Free list to speed up creation */
static QSLIST_HEAD(, Coroutine) release_pool = QSLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(pool);
-static unsigned int pool_batch_size = POOL_INITIAL_BATCH_SIZE;
+static unsigned int pool_max_size = POOL_INITIAL_MAX_SIZE;
static unsigned int release_pool_size;
static __thread QSLIST_HEAD(, Coroutine) alloc_pool = QSLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(pool);
static __thread unsigned int alloc_pool_size;
@@ -51,7 +57,7 @@ Coroutine *qemu_coroutine_create(CoroutineEntry *entry, void *opaque)
if (CONFIG_COROUTINE_POOL) {
co = QSLIST_FIRST(&alloc_pool);
if (!co) {
- if (release_pool_size > qatomic_read(&pool_batch_size)) {
+ if (release_pool_size > POOL_MIN_BATCH_SIZE) {
/* Slow path; a good place to register the destructor, too. */
if (!coroutine_pool_cleanup_notifier.notify) {
coroutine_pool_cleanup_notifier.notify = coroutine_pool_cleanup;
@@ -88,12 +94,12 @@ static void coroutine_delete(Coroutine *co)
co->caller = NULL;
if (CONFIG_COROUTINE_POOL) {
- if (release_pool_size < qatomic_read(&pool_batch_size) * 2) {
+ if (release_pool_size < qatomic_read(&pool_max_size) * 2) {
QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC(&release_pool, co, pool_next);
qatomic_inc(&release_pool_size);
return;
}
- if (alloc_pool_size < qatomic_read(&pool_batch_size)) {
+ if (alloc_pool_size < qatomic_read(&pool_max_size)) {
QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&alloc_pool, co, pool_next);
alloc_pool_size++;
return;
@@ -207,10 +213,10 @@ AioContext *coroutine_fn qemu_coroutine_get_aio_context(Coroutine *co)
void qemu_coroutine_inc_pool_size(unsigned int additional_pool_size)
{
- qatomic_add(&pool_batch_size, additional_pool_size);
+ qatomic_add(&pool_max_size, additional_pool_size);
}
void qemu_coroutine_dec_pool_size(unsigned int removing_pool_size)
{
- qatomic_sub(&pool_batch_size, removing_pool_size);
+ qatomic_sub(&pool_max_size, removing_pool_size);
}
--
2.31.1