From 9a7df595bbe360132cb37c8b39aa1fd9ac24b43f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:10:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 25/52] imsm: block changing slots during creation
If user specifies drives for array creation, then slot order across
volumes is not preserved.
Ideally, it should be checked in validate_geometry() but it is not
possible in current implementation (order is determined later).
Add verification in add_to_super_imsm_volume() and throw error if
mismatch is detected.
IMSM allows to use only same members within container.
This is not hardware dependency but metadata limitation.
Therefore, 09-imsm-overlap test is removed. Testing it is pointless.
After this patch, creation in this scenario is blocked. Offset
verification is covered in other tests.
Signed-off-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
---
super-intel.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
tests/09imsm-overlap | 28 ----------------------------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 tests/09imsm-overlap
diff --git a/super-intel.c b/super-intel.c
index deef7c87..8ffe485c 100644
--- a/super-intel.c
+++ b/super-intel.c
@@ -5789,6 +5789,10 @@ static int add_to_super_imsm_volume(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
struct imsm_map *map;
struct dl *dl, *df;
int slot;
+ int autolayout = 0;
+
+ if (!is_fd_valid(fd))
+ autolayout = 1;
dev = get_imsm_dev(super, super->current_vol);
map = get_imsm_map(dev, MAP_0);
@@ -5799,25 +5803,32 @@ static int add_to_super_imsm_volume(struct supertype *st, mdu_disk_info_t *dk,
return 1;
}
- if (!is_fd_valid(fd)) {
- /* we're doing autolayout so grab the pre-marked (in
- * validate_geometry) raid_disk
- */
- for (dl = super->disks; dl; dl = dl->next)
+ for (dl = super->disks; dl ; dl = dl->next) {
+ if (autolayout) {
if (dl->raiddisk == dk->raid_disk)
break;
- } else {
- for (dl = super->disks; dl ; dl = dl->next)
- if (dl->major == dk->major &&
- dl->minor == dk->minor)
- break;
+ } else if (dl->major == dk->major && dl->minor == dk->minor)
+ break;
}
if (!dl) {
- pr_err("%s is not a member of the same container\n", devname);
+ if (!autolayout)
+ pr_err("%s is not a member of the same container.\n",
+ devname);
return 1;
}
+ if (!autolayout && super->current_vol > 0) {
+ int _slot = get_disk_slot_in_dev(super, 0, dl->index);
+
+ if (_slot != dk->raid_disk) {
+ pr_err("Member %s is in %d slot for the first volume, but is in %d slot for a new volume.\n",
+ dl->devname, _slot, dk->raid_disk);
+ pr_err("Raid members are in different order than for the first volume, aborting.\n");
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
if (mpb->num_disks == 0)
if (!get_dev_sector_size(dl->fd, dl->devname,
&super->sector_size))
diff --git a/tests/09imsm-overlap b/tests/09imsm-overlap
deleted file mode 100644
index ff5d2093..00000000
--- a/tests/09imsm-overlap
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
-
-. tests/env-imsm-template
-
-# create raid arrays with varying degress of overlap
-mdadm -CR $container -e imsm -n 6 $dev0 $dev1 $dev2 $dev3 $dev4 $dev5
-imsm_check container 6
-
-size=1024
-level=1
-num_disks=2
-mdadm -CR $member0 $dev0 $dev1 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
-mdadm -CR $member1 $dev1 $dev2 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
-mdadm -CR $member2 $dev2 $dev3 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
-mdadm -CR $member3 $dev3 $dev4 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
-mdadm -CR $member4 $dev4 $dev5 -n $num_disks -l $level -z $size
-
-udevadm settle
-
-offset=0
-imsm_check member $member0 $num_disks $level $size 1024 $offset
-offset=$((offset+size+4096))
-imsm_check member $member1 $num_disks $level $size 1024 $offset
-offset=$((offset+size+4096))
-imsm_check member $member2 $num_disks $level $size 1024 $offset
-offset=$((offset+size+4096))
-imsm_check member $member3 $num_disks $level $size 1024 $offset
-offset=$((offset+size+4096))
-imsm_check member $member4 $num_disks $level $size 1024 $offset
--
2.31.1