Blob Blame History Raw
From 476ed77dafaf2b43298ddd936320cd5d3739e0a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-Id: <476ed77dafaf2b43298ddd936320cd5d3739e0a1@dist-git>
From: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:10:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: Document how libvirt handles companion controllers

The information on companion controllers we give in our documentation is
rather sparse.  For example, it looks like any controller can be used as
a companion one.  Also, when using ich9-uhci2, for example, we are able
to set some sensible defaults, but it might get confusing for the user
as we don't do that for all controller models.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069590

Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit b84a2cd87dad4a10e3a0064c30ac3df037048101)
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
---
 docs/formatdomain.html.in | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/formatdomain.html.in b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
index 8785200..e2ccfa5 100644
--- a/docs/formatdomain.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatdomain.html.in
@@ -3007,6 +3007,11 @@
       relationship of the companion to its master controller.
       A companion controller is on the same bus as its master, so
       the companion <code>index</code> value should be equal.
+      Not all controller models can be used as companion controllers
+      and libvirt might provide some sensible defaults (settings
+      of <code>master startport</code> and <code>function</code> of an
+      address) for some particular models.
+      Preferred companion controllers are <code>ich-uhci[123]</code>.
     </p>
 
 <pre>
-- 
2.5.0