From a3af0aff50cd3e899cb5205d4d5330a96aeffaa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Phil Sutter <psutter@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 17:30:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] chain: Hash chain list by name
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658533
Upstream Status: libnftnl commit 7170f0929ef50
commit 7170f0929ef50a1a45d9fd5d058ea6178c8e56ef
Author: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Date: Tue Dec 11 18:44:00 2018 +0100
chain: Hash chain list by name
Introduce a hash table to speedup nftnl_chain_list_lookup_byname(). In
theory this could replace the linked list completely but has been left
in place so that nftnl_chain_list_add_tail() still does what it's
supposed to and iterators return chains in original order.
Speed was tested using a simple script which creates a dump file
containing a number of custom chains and for each of them two rules in
INPUT chain jumping to it. The following table compares run-time of
iptables-legacy-restore with iptables-nft-restore before and after this
patch:
count legacy nft-old nft-new
----------------------------------------------
10000 26s 38s 31s
50000 137s 339s 149s
So while it is still not as quick, it now scales nicely (at least in
this very primitive test).
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
src/chain.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/chain.c b/src/chain.c
index 22bb45c..ae074fd 100644
--- a/src/chain.c
+++ b/src/chain.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
struct nftnl_chain {
struct list_head head;
+ struct hlist_node hnode;
const char *name;
const char *type;
@@ -991,20 +992,27 @@ void nftnl_rule_iter_destroy(struct nftnl_rule_iter *iter)
xfree(iter);
}
+#define CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE 512
+
struct nftnl_chain_list {
+
struct list_head list;
+ struct hlist_head name_hash[CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE];
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nftnl_chain_list_alloc);
struct nftnl_chain_list *nftnl_chain_list_alloc(void)
{
struct nftnl_chain_list *list;
+ int i;
list = calloc(1, sizeof(struct nftnl_chain_list));
if (list == NULL)
return NULL;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list->list);
+ for (i = 0; i < CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE; i++)
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&list->name_hash[i]);
return list;
}
@@ -1016,6 +1024,7 @@ void nftnl_chain_list_free(struct nftnl_chain_list *list)
list_for_each_entry_safe(r, tmp, &list->list, head) {
list_del(&r->head);
+ hlist_del(&r->hnode);
nftnl_chain_free(r);
}
xfree(list);
@@ -1027,15 +1036,31 @@ int nftnl_chain_list_is_empty(const struct nftnl_chain_list *list)
return list_empty(&list->list);
}
+static uint32_t djb_hash(const char *key)
+{
+ uint32_t i, hash = 5381;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < strlen(key); i++)
+ hash = ((hash << 5) + hash) + key[i];
+
+ return hash;
+}
+
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nftnl_chain_list_add);
void nftnl_chain_list_add(struct nftnl_chain *r, struct nftnl_chain_list *list)
{
+ int key = djb_hash(r->name) % CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE;
+
+ hlist_add_head(&r->hnode, &list->name_hash[key]);
list_add(&r->head, &list->list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nftnl_chain_list_add_tail);
void nftnl_chain_list_add_tail(struct nftnl_chain *r, struct nftnl_chain_list *list)
{
+ int key = djb_hash(r->name) % CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE;
+
+ hlist_add_head(&r->hnode, &list->name_hash[key]);
list_add_tail(&r->head, &list->list);
}
@@ -1043,6 +1068,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(nftnl_chain_list_del);
void nftnl_chain_list_del(struct nftnl_chain *r)
{
list_del(&r->head);
+ hlist_del(&r->hnode);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nftnl_chain_list_foreach);
@@ -1066,9 +1092,11 @@ struct nftnl_chain *
nftnl_chain_list_lookup_byname(struct nftnl_chain_list *chain_list,
const char *chain)
{
+ int key = djb_hash(chain) % CHAIN_NAME_HSIZE;
struct nftnl_chain *c;
+ struct hlist_node *n;
- list_for_each_entry(c, &chain_list->list, head) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry(c, n, &chain_list->name_hash[key], hnode) {
if (!strcmp(chain, c->name))
return c;
}
--
1.8.3.1