From c43afb47fcbadabe2655fe7863a1e2ea9af1446c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:59:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] dmidecode: Use the most appropriate unit for cache size

As newer CPUs have larger and larger cache, using kB to represent the
cache size is getting less convenient. Reuse the same function we have
for system memory size so that large units will be used as
appropriate. For example, a cache size reported as "20 MB" looks nicer
than as "20480 kB".

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
---
 dmidecode.c | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dmidecode.c b/dmidecode.c
index 7ac6438..162e0c5 100644
--- a/dmidecode.c
+++ b/dmidecode.c
@@ -1560,17 +1560,22 @@ static void dmi_cache_size(u16 code)
 
 static void dmi_cache_size_2(u32 code)
 {
+	u64 size;
+
 	if (code & 0x80000000)
 	{
 		code &= 0x7FFFFFFFLU;
-		/* Use a more convenient unit for large cache size */
-		if (code >= 0x8000)
-			printf(" %u MB", code >> 4);
-		else
-			printf(" %u kB", code << 6);
+		size.l = code << 6;
+		size.h = code >> 26;
 	}
 	else
-		printf(" %u kB", code);
+	{
+		size.l = code;
+		size.h = 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Use a more convenient unit for large cache size */
+	dmi_print_memory_size(size, 1);
 }
 
 static void dmi_cache_types(u16 code, const char *sep)
-- 
2.17.1