From c715be5f677ab61704ffe358716cf700d662b82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Watanabe <watanabe.yu+github@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 09:29:42 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] udev-node: drop redundant trial of devlink creation
Previously, the devlink was created based on the priority saved in udev
database. So, we needed to reevaluate devlinks after database is saved.
But now the priority is stored in the symlink under /run/udev/links, and
the loop of devlink creation is controlled with the timestamp of the
directory. So, the double evaluation is not necessary anymore.
(cherry picked from commit 7920d0a135fb6a08aa0bfc31e9d0a3f589fe7a1f)
Related: #2005024
---
src/udev/udev-event.c | 5 +----
src/udev/udev-node.c | 12 ++++--------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/udev/udev-event.c b/src/udev/udev-event.c
index 8b9f8aecfe..c77f55c67e 100644
--- a/src/udev/udev-event.c
+++ b/src/udev/udev-event.c
@@ -1060,10 +1060,7 @@ int udev_event_execute_rules(
device_set_is_initialized(dev);
- /* Yes, we run update_devnode() twice, because in the first invocation, that is before update of udev database,
- * it could happen that two contenders are replacing each other's symlink. Hence we run it again to make sure
- * symlinks point to devices that claim them with the highest priority. */
- return update_devnode(event);
+ return 0;
}
void udev_event_execute_run(UdevEvent *event, usec_t timeout_usec, int timeout_signal) {
diff --git a/src/udev/udev-node.c b/src/udev/udev-node.c
index 675e6ce313..bb551d86b0 100644
--- a/src/udev/udev-node.c
+++ b/src/udev/udev-node.c
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
_cleanup_free_ char *slink = NULL, *dirname = NULL;
const char *slink_name;
char name_enc[NAME_MAX+1];
- int i, r, retries;
+ int r;
assert(dev);
assert(slink_in);
@@ -443,11 +443,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
if (r < 0)
return r;
- /* If the database entry is not written yet we will just do one iteration and possibly wrong symlink
- * will be fixed in the second invocation. */
- retries = sd_device_get_is_initialized(dev) > 0 ? LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES : 1;
-
- for (i = 0; i < retries; i++) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
_cleanup_free_ char *target = NULL;
struct stat st1 = {}, st2 = {};
@@ -472,7 +468,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
log_device_debug_errno(dev, errno, "Failed to remove '%s', ignoring: %m", slink);
(void) rmdir_parents(slink, "/dev");
- break;
+ return 0;
}
r = node_symlink(dev, target, slink);
@@ -487,7 +483,7 @@ static int link_update(sd_device *dev, const char *slink_in, bool add) {
return 0;
}
- return i < LINK_UPDATE_MAX_RETRIES ? 0 : -ELOOP;
+ return -ELOOP;
}
static int device_get_devpath_by_devnum(sd_device *dev, char **ret) {