From caa17bcb65ea65a9fa39e7d6117a87cc7cc9c0ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 07:56:37 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
RH-Author: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
Message-id: <20180928075639.16746-4-otubo@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 82315
O-Subject: [RHEL-8 qemu-kvm PATCH 3/5] seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available
Bugzilla: 1618356
RH-Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
commit bda08a5764d470f101fa38635d30b41179a313e1
Author: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Aug 22 19:02:48 2018 +0200
seccomp: prefer SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS if available
The upcoming libseccomp release should have SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS
action (https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/96).
SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS is preferable to immediately terminate the
offending process, rather than having the SIGSYS handler running.
Use SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL to check availability of kernel support,
as libseccomp will fallback on SCMP_ACT_KILL otherwise, and we still
prefer SCMP_ACT_TRAP.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@rehdat.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo C. L. de Paula <ddepaula@redhat.com>
---
qemu-seccomp.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
index b88fa05..10fcfa3 100644
--- a/qemu-seccomp.c
+++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include "qemu/osdep.h"
#include <seccomp.h>
#include "sysemu/seccomp.h"
+#include <linux/seccomp.h>
/* For some architectures (notably ARM) cacheflush is not supported until
* libseccomp 2.2.3, but configure enforces that we are using a more recent
@@ -102,12 +103,40 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall blacklist[] = {
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_get_priority_min), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
};
+static inline __attribute__((unused)) int
+qemu_seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args)
+{
+#ifdef __NR_seccomp
+ return syscall(__NR_seccomp, operation, flags, args);
+#else
+ errno = ENOSYS;
+ return -1;
+#endif
+}
+
+static uint32_t qemu_seccomp_get_kill_action(void)
+{
+#if defined(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL) && defined(SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS) && \
+ defined(SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS)
+ {
+ uint32_t action = SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS;
+
+ if (qemu_seccomp(SECCOMP_GET_ACTION_AVAIL, 0, &action) == 0) {
+ return SCMP_ACT_KILL_PROCESS;
+ }
+ }
+#endif
+
+ return SCMP_ACT_TRAP;
+}
+
int seccomp_start(uint32_t seccomp_opts)
{
int rc = 0;
unsigned int i = 0;
scmp_filter_ctx ctx;
+ uint32_t action = qemu_seccomp_get_kill_action();
ctx = seccomp_init(SCMP_ACT_ALLOW);
if (ctx == NULL) {
@@ -120,7 +149,7 @@ int seccomp_start(uint32_t seccomp_opts)
continue;
}
- rc = seccomp_rule_add_array(ctx, SCMP_ACT_TRAP, blacklist[i].num,
+ rc = seccomp_rule_add_array(ctx, action, blacklist[i].num,
blacklist[i].narg, blacklist[i].arg_cmp);
if (rc < 0) {
goto seccomp_return;
--
1.8.3.1