From c18e8f4bf7a628949f0d79facf91ddf6d07401e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:07:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 38/40] memory: syncronize kvm bitmap using bitmaps operations
RH-Author: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Message-id: <1389712071-23303-39-git-send-email-quintela@redhat.com>
Patchwork-id: 56693
O-Subject: [RHEL7 qemu-kvm PATCH 38/40] memory: syncronize kvm bitmap using bitmaps operations
Bugzilla: 997559
RH-Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
RH-Acked-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git) <dgilbert@redhat.com>
If bitmaps are aligned properly, use bitmap operations. If they are
not, just use old bit at a time code.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit ae2810c4bb3b383176e8e1b33931b16c01483aab)
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>
---
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
---
include/exec/ram_addr.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/exec/ram_addr.h b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
index 9962e12..080a8b1 100644
--- a/include/exec/ram_addr.h
+++ b/include/exec/ram_addr.h
@@ -82,29 +82,47 @@ static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_lebitmap(unsigned long *bitmap,
ram_addr_t start,
ram_addr_t pages)
{
- unsigned int i, j;
+ unsigned long i, j;
unsigned long page_number, c;
hwaddr addr;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
- unsigned int len = (pages + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) / HOST_LONG_BITS;
+ unsigned long len = (pages + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) / HOST_LONG_BITS;
unsigned long hpratio = getpagesize() / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ unsigned long page = BIT_WORD(start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
- /*
- * bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
- * especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- if (bitmap[i] != 0) {
- c = leul_to_cpu(bitmap[i]);
- do {
- j = ffsl(c) - 1;
- c &= ~(1ul << j);
- page_number = (i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j) * hpratio;
- addr = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
- ram_addr = start + addr;
- cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr,
- TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * hpratio);
- } while (c != 0);
+ /* start address is aligned at the start of a word? */
+ if (((page * BITS_PER_LONG) << TARGET_PAGE_BITS) == start) {
+ long k;
+ long nr = BITS_TO_LONGS(pages);
+
+ for (k = 0; k < nr; k++) {
+ if (bitmap[k]) {
+ unsigned long temp = leul_to_cpu(bitmap[k]);
+
+ ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION][page + k] |= temp;
+ ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA][page + k] |= temp;
+ ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_CODE][page + k] |= temp;
+ }
+ }
+ xen_modified_memory(start, pages);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
+ * especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (bitmap[i] != 0) {
+ c = leul_to_cpu(bitmap[i]);
+ do {
+ j = ffsl(c) - 1;
+ c &= ~(1ul << j);
+ page_number = (i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j) * hpratio;
+ addr = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ ram_addr = start + addr;
+ cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_range(ram_addr,
+ TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * hpratio);
+ } while (c != 0);
+ }
}
}
}
--
1.7.1