Blame SOURCES/0001-xrandr-init-the-name-to-0.patch

2a91e2
From a2134406ab0aef44e7b710e1e2a2a40965e96692 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
2a91e2
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
2a91e2
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:44:16 +1000
2a91e2
Subject: [PATCH app/xrandr] init the name to 0
2a91e2
2a91e2
There are a few conditions where coverity finds a use of an uninitialized
2a91e2
field of the name_t struct. These are rather messy combinations of conditions,
2a91e2
so let's go with the simple solution here and just init everything to 0.
2a91e2
This may still have side-effects but at least they'll be more obvious than the
2a91e2
previous "use whatever memory is leftover from breakfast".
2a91e2
2a91e2
This patch also adds a missing init_name(), much for the same reason.
2a91e2
2a91e2
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
2a91e2
---
2a91e2
 xrandr.c | 2 ++
2a91e2
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
2a91e2
2a91e2
diff --git a/xrandr.c b/xrandr.c
2a91e2
index 7f1e867..ce3cd91 100644
2a91e2
--- a/xrandr.c
2a91e2
+++ b/xrandr.c
2a91e2
@@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ print_verbose_mode (const XRRModeInfo *mode, Bool current, Bool preferred)
2a91e2
 static void
2a91e2
 init_name (name_t *name)
2a91e2
 {
2a91e2
+    memset(name, 0, sizeof(*name));
2a91e2
     name->kind = name_none;
2a91e2
 }
2a91e2
 
2a91e2
@@ -1822,6 +1823,7 @@ get_outputs (void)
2a91e2
 	output_t	*output;
2a91e2
 	name_t		output_name;
2a91e2
 	if (!output_info) fatal ("could not get output 0x%lx information\n", res->outputs[o]);
2a91e2
+	init_name(&output_name);
2a91e2
 	set_name_xid (&output_name, res->outputs[o]);
2a91e2
 	set_name_index (&output_name, o);
2a91e2
 	set_name_string (&output_name, output_info->name);
2a91e2
-- 
2a91e2
2.17.1
2a91e2