diff --git a/7.3.787 b/7.3.787
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d705c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/7.3.787
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+To: vim_dev@googlegroups.com
+Subject: Patch 7.3.787
+Fcc: outbox
+From: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@moolenaar.net>
+Mime-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+------------
+
+Patch 7.3.787
+Problem:    With 'relativenumber' set it is not possible to see the absolute
+	    line number.
+Solution:   For the cursor line show the absolute line number instead of a
+	    zero. (Nazri Ramliy)
+Files:	    src/screen.c
+
+
+*** ../vim-7.3.786/src/screen.c	2012-12-05 16:10:21.000000000 +0100
+--- src/screen.c	2013-01-30 12:29:33.000000000 +0100
+***************
+*** 2319,2324 ****
+--- 2319,2325 ----
+  	{
+  	    int	    w = number_width(wp);
+  	    long num;
++ 	    char *fmt = "%*ld ";
+  
+  	    if (len > w + 1)
+  		len = w + 1;
+***************
+*** 2327,2336 ****
+  		/* 'number' */
+  		num = (long)lnum;
+  	    else
+  		/* 'relativenumber', don't use negative numbers */
+  		num = labs((long)get_cursor_rel_lnum(wp, lnum));
+  
+! 	    sprintf((char *)buf, "%*ld ", w, num);
+  #ifdef FEAT_RIGHTLEFT
+  	    if (wp->w_p_rl)
+  		/* the line number isn't reversed */
+--- 2328,2344 ----
+  		/* 'number' */
+  		num = (long)lnum;
+  	    else
++ 	    {
+  		/* 'relativenumber', don't use negative numbers */
+  		num = labs((long)get_cursor_rel_lnum(wp, lnum));
++ 		if (num == 0)
++ 		{
++ 		    num = lnum;
++ 		    fmt = "%-*ld ";
++ 		}
++ 	    }
+  
+! 	    sprintf((char *)buf, fmt, w, num);
+  #ifdef FEAT_RIGHTLEFT
+  	    if (wp->w_p_rl)
+  		/* the line number isn't reversed */
+***************
+*** 3484,3498 ****
+  			    )
+  		    {
+  			long num;
+  
+  			if (wp->w_p_nu)
+  			    /* 'number' */
+  			    num = (long)lnum;
+  			else
+  			    /* 'relativenumber', don't use negative numbers */
+  			    num = labs((long)get_cursor_rel_lnum(wp, lnum));
+  
+! 			sprintf((char *)extra, "%*ld ",
+  						number_width(wp), num);
+  			if (wp->w_skipcol > 0)
+  			    for (p_extra = extra; *p_extra == ' '; ++p_extra)
+--- 3492,3514 ----
+  			    )
+  		    {
+  			long num;
++ 			char *fmt = "%*ld ";
+  
+  			if (wp->w_p_nu)
+  			    /* 'number' */
+  			    num = (long)lnum;
+  			else
++ 			{
+  			    /* 'relativenumber', don't use negative numbers */
+  			    num = labs((long)get_cursor_rel_lnum(wp, lnum));
++ 			    if (num == 0)
++ 			    {
++ 				num = lnum;
++ 				fmt = "%-*ld ";
++ 			    }
++ 			}
+  
+! 			sprintf((char *)extra, fmt,
+  						number_width(wp), num);
+  			if (wp->w_skipcol > 0)
+  			    for (p_extra = extra; *p_extra == ' '; ++p_extra)
+***************
+*** 3513,3519 ****
+  		     * the current line differently.
+  		     * TODO: Can we use CursorLine instead of CursorLineNr
+  		     * when CursorLineNr isn't set? */
+! 		    if (wp->w_p_cul && lnum == wp->w_cursor.lnum)
+  			char_attr = hl_attr(HLF_CLN);
+  #endif
+  		}
+--- 3529,3536 ----
+  		     * the current line differently.
+  		     * TODO: Can we use CursorLine instead of CursorLineNr
+  		     * when CursorLineNr isn't set? */
+! 		    if ((wp->w_p_cul || wp->w_p_rnu)
+! 						 && lnum == wp->w_cursor.lnum)
+  			char_attr = hl_attr(HLF_CLN);
+  #endif
+  		}
+***************
+*** 10238,10249 ****
+      int		n;
+      linenr_T	lnum;
+  
+!     if (wp->w_p_nu)
+! 	/* 'number' */
+! 	lnum = wp->w_buffer->b_ml.ml_line_count;
+!     else
+! 	/* 'relativenumber' */
+! 	lnum = wp->w_height;
+  
+      if (lnum == wp->w_nrwidth_line_count)
+  	return wp->w_nrwidth_width;
+--- 10255,10261 ----
+      int		n;
+      linenr_T	lnum;
+  
+!     lnum = wp->w_buffer->b_ml.ml_line_count;
+  
+      if (lnum == wp->w_nrwidth_line_count)
+  	return wp->w_nrwidth_width;
+*** ../vim-7.3.786/src/version.c	2013-01-30 11:44:33.000000000 +0100
+--- src/version.c	2013-01-30 12:25:10.000000000 +0100
+***************
+*** 727,728 ****
+--- 727,730 ----
+  {   /* Add new patch number below this line */
++ /**/
++     787,
+  /**/
+
+-- 
+ARTHUR:        A scratch?  Your arm's off!
+BLACK KNIGHT:  No, it isn't.
+ARTHUR:        Well, what's that then?
+BLACK KNIGHT:  I've had worse.
+                                  The Quest for the Holy Grail (Monty Python)
+
+ /// Bram Moolenaar -- Bram@Moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
+///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
+\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
+ \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///