From fe15b97e44beb69305d3970a3748624ae76f9f04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 09:39:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] test-process-util: also add EROFS to the list of "good" errors It is only added in the one place where we actually try to set the setting to a new value. Before we were testing if we can set to it the existing value, which was a noop. We could still get a permission error, but this is the first place where we would propagate EROFS. (cherry picked from commit 6434a83d01d96e9f9a17ed9ce1f04a7d64859950) Related: #1977569 --- src/test/test-procfs-util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/test/test-procfs-util.c b/src/test/test-procfs-util.c index bb6943fed0..d656c4df4f 100644 --- a/src/test/test-procfs-util.c +++ b/src/test/test-procfs-util.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { r = procfs_tasks_set_limit(v-1); log_info_errno(r, "procfs_tasks_set_limit: %m"); - assert_se(r >= 0 || ERRNO_IS_PRIVILEGE(r)); + assert_se(r >= 0 || ERRNO_IS_PRIVILEGE(r) || r == -EROFS); assert_se(procfs_get_threads_max(&w) >= 0); assert_se(r >= 0 ? w == v - 1 : w == v);