Blame SOURCES/0002-testsuite-Correct-syntax-for-gdb-backtrace-command.patch

ab97dd
From 91e3bc23a654e3daf1bf6546b06b9de7d00dbd59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
ab97dd
From: Martin Kutlak <mkutlak@redhat.com>
ab97dd
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 10:52:48 +0200
ab97dd
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Correct syntax for gdb backtrace command
ab97dd
ab97dd
The test failed on rawhide (gdb v8.1.50) with error message:
ab97dd
"A syntax error in expression, near `full'."
ab97dd
ab97dd
According to the GDB documentation the correct syntax for backtrace
ab97dd
command is `backtrace [full] n`.
ab97dd
ab97dd
- https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Backtrace.html
ab97dd
ab97dd
Signed-off-by: Martin Kutlak <mkutlak@redhat.com>
ab97dd
---
ab97dd
 tests/core_stacktrace.at | 2 +-
ab97dd
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
ab97dd
ab97dd
diff --git a/tests/core_stacktrace.at b/tests/core_stacktrace.at
ab97dd
index 7f6198e..13678c8 100644
ab97dd
--- a/tests/core_stacktrace.at
ab97dd
+++ b/tests/core_stacktrace.at
ab97dd
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ get_backtrace(const char *core_file, const char *executable)
ab97dd
   args[i++] = (char*)"-ex";
ab97dd
   args[i++] = sr_asprintf("core-file %s", core_file);
ab97dd
   args[i++] = (char*)"-ex";
ab97dd
-  args[i++] = (char*)"thread apply all -ascending backtrace 1024 full";
ab97dd
+  args[i++] = (char*)"thread apply all -ascending backtrace full 1024";
ab97dd
   args[i++] = (char*)"-ex";
ab97dd
   args[i++] = (char*)"info sharedlib";
ab97dd
   args[i++] = (char*)"-ex";
ab97dd
-- 
ab97dd
2.17.1
ab97dd