From 2d8954c8a00f871e4010f0b4153d0d45339694f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: CentOS Sources Date: Apr 26 2017 09:21:53 +0000 Subject: import rh-ror50-rubygem-turbolinks-source-5.0.0-1.el7 --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a47410 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +SOURCES/turbolinks-source-5.0.0.gem diff --git a/.rh-ror50-rubygem-turbolinks-source.metadata b/.rh-ror50-rubygem-turbolinks-source.metadata new file mode 100644 index 0000000..914c94d --- /dev/null +++ b/.rh-ror50-rubygem-turbolinks-source.metadata @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +eb0e496941aec8bd48390799978cd52240b1c81b SOURCES/turbolinks-source-5.0.0.gem diff --git a/README.md b/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index 98f42b4..0000000 --- a/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -The master branch has no content - -Look at the c7 branch if you are working with CentOS-7, or the c4/c5/c6 branch for CentOS-4, 5 or 6 -If you find this file in a distro specific branch, it means that no content has been checked in yet diff --git a/SPECS/rubygem-turbolinks-source.spec b/SPECS/rubygem-turbolinks-source.spec new file mode 100644 index 0000000..464b7d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/SPECS/rubygem-turbolinks-source.spec @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +%{?scl:%scl_package rubygem-%{gem_name}} +%{!?scl:%global pkg_name %{name}} + +# Generated from turbolinks-source-5.0.0.gem by gem2rpm -*- rpm-spec -*- +%global gem_name turbolinks-source + +Name: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem-%{gem_name} +Version: 5.0.0 +Release: 1%{?dist} +Summary: Turbolinks JavaScript assets +Group: Development/Languages +License: MIT +URL: https://github.com/turbolinks/turbolinks-source-gem +Source0: https://rubygems.org/gems/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem +Requires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby(release) +Requires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby(rubygems) +BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby(release) +BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby(rubygems) +BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}ruby +BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix_ruby}rubygems-devel +BuildArch: noarch +# We don't have js-turbolinks in Fedora yet and it would be quite demmanding +# to unbundle it :/ Anyway, I started discussion with upstream on this topic. +# https://github.com/turbolinks/turbolinks-rails/issues/11 +Provides: bundled(turbolinks) = 5.0.0 +Provides: %{?scl_prefix}rubygem(%{gem_name}) = %{version} + +# Explicitly require runtime subpackage, as long as older scl-utils do not generate it +%{?scl:Requires: %{?scl_prefix}runtime} + +%description +Turbolinks JavaScript assets. + +%package doc +Summary: Documentation for %{pkg_name} +Group: Documentation +Requires: %{?scl_prefix}%{pkg_name} = %{version}-%{release} +BuildArch: noarch + +%description doc +Documentation for %{pkg_name}. + +%prep +%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} - << \EOF} +set -e +gem unpack %{SOURCE0} + +%setup -q -D -T -n %{gem_name}-%{version} + +gem spec %{SOURCE0} -l --ruby > %{gem_name}.gemspec +%{?scl:EOF} + +%build +%{?scl:scl enable %{scl} - << \EOF} +set -e +gem build %{gem_name}.gemspec + +%gem_install +%{?scl:EOF} + +%install +mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gem_dir} +cp -a .%{gem_dir}/* \ + %{buildroot}%{gem_dir}/ + +%check +pushd .%{gem_instdir} +# There are no tests upstream. +popd + +%files +# There is no %%license macro on RHEL6. +# https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386246 +%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} + +%dir %{gem_instdir} +%license %{gem_instdir}/LICENSE +%{gem_libdir} +%exclude %{gem_cache} +%{gem_spec} + +%files doc +%doc %{gem_docdir} +%doc %{gem_instdir}/README.md + +%changelog +* Fri Jul 22 2016 Vít Ondruch - 5.0.0-1 +- Initial package