|
 |
4dad76 |
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:22:10 -0600
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Subject: Re: Pod::Html license
|
|
|
4dad76 |
From: Tom Christiansen <tchrist53147@gmail.com>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
To: Petr Šabata <contyk@redhat.com>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Cc: Tom Christiansen <tchrist@perl.com>, marcgreen@cpan.org,
|
|
|
4dad76 |
jplesnik@redhat.com
|
|
|
4dad76 |
MIME-Version: 1.0
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
|
|
|
4dad76 |
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Yes, it was supposed to be licensed just like the rest of Perl.
|
|
|
4dad76 |
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Sent from my Sprint phone
|
|
|
4dad76 |
|
|
|
4dad76 |
Petr Šabata <contyk@redhat.com> wrote:
|
|
|
4dad76 |
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>Marc, Tom,
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>I'm reviewing licensing of our perl package in Fedora and
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>noticed Pod::HTML and its pod2html script are licensed under
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>the Artistic license (only).
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>This is an issue for us as this license isn't considered free by
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>FSF [0]. Unless the license of this core component changes, we
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>will have to drop it from the tarball and remove support for it
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>from all the modules we ship that use it, such as Module::Build
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>or Module::Install.
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>What I've seen in the past is authors originally claiming their
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>module was released under Artistic while what they actually meant
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>was the common `the same as perl itself', i.e. `GPL+/Aristic' [1],
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>an FSF free license. Is it possible this is also the case
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>of Pod::Html?
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>Thanks,
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>Petr
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>(also CC'ing Jitka, the primary package maintainer in Fedora)
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>[0] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#ArtisticLicense
|
|
|
4dad76 |
>[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#PerlLicense
|