Return-Path: rt-cpan-org-return@perl.org Received: from zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (LHLO zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com) (10.5.81.11) by zmail14.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com with LMTP; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A08BDA0C9 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by zmta04.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E9D1F23 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAIG6A3W024510 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:10 -0500 Received: from rtcpan.develooper.com (rtcpan.develooper.com [207.171.7.181]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAIG69Uk032392 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:09 -0500 Received: by rtcpan.develooper.com (Postfix, from userid 536) id D3030FA; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 08:06:08 -0800 (PST) Precedence: normal Subject: [rt.cpan.org #90483] missing license file From: "Alexandr Ciornii via RT" Reply-To: bug-Text-ParseWords@rt.cpan.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: X-RT-Loop-Prevention: rt.cpan.org RT-Ticket: rt.cpan.org #90483 Managed-BY: RT 4.0.18 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) RT-Originator: CHORNY@cpan.org To: mmaslano@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:06:08 -0500 X-RedHat-Spam-Score: -1.9 (BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.110.19 On Mon Nov 18 10:37:28 2013, mmaslano@redhat.com wrote: > It would be a big help if you have better defined license. License > text in .pm file would be enough. Will do in next version. > I found Perl license in Makefile.PL, > so we assumed it's Perl (GPL+ or Artistic). Is it correct? yes -- Alexandr Ciornii, http://chorny.net