Blame SOURCES/0097-Detail-fix-segfault-during-IMSM-raid-creation.patch

e95a18
From c3129b39a7d467eec063681529f46f84a2a85308 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
e95a18
From: Lidong Zhong <lidong.zhong@suse.com>
e95a18
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 23:12:29 +0800
e95a18
Subject: [PATCH 097/108] Detail: fix segfault during IMSM raid creation
e95a18
e95a18
It can be reproduced with non IMSM hardware and IMSM_NO_PLATFORM
e95a18
environmental variable set. The array state is inactive when creating
e95a18
an IMSM container. And the structure info is NULL because load_super()
e95a18
always fails since no intel HBA information could be obtained.
e95a18
e95a18
Signed-off-by: Lidong Zhong <lidong.zhong@suse.com>
e95a18
Reported-by: Tkaczyk Mariusz <mariusz.tkaczyk@intel.com>
e95a18
Fixes: 64bf4dff3430 (Detail: show correct raid level when the array is inactive)
e95a18
---
e95a18
 Detail.c | 2 +-
e95a18
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
e95a18
e95a18
diff --git a/Detail.c b/Detail.c
e95a18
index b6587c8..ea86884 100644
e95a18
--- a/Detail.c
e95a18
+++ b/Detail.c
e95a18
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int Detail(char *dev, struct context *c)
e95a18
 	}
e95a18
 
e95a18
 	/* Ok, we have some info to print... */
e95a18
-	if (inactive)
e95a18
+	if (inactive && info)
e95a18
 		str = map_num(pers, info->array.level);
e95a18
 	else
e95a18
 		str = map_num(pers, array.level);
e95a18
-- 
e95a18
2.7.5
e95a18