From 9ab861c9a630d07a8ac0240f81dd0067b6c57963 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Savitz Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:49:09 -0400 Subject: [KPATCH CVE-2021-37576] KVM: PPC: kpatch fixes for CVE-2021-37576 Kernels: 3.10.0-1160.el7 3.10.0-1160.2.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.15.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.41.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7 Changes since last build: arches: ppc64le book3s_rtas.o: changed function: kvmppc_rtas_hcall --------------------------- Kernels: 3.10.0-1160.2.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.2.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.6.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.11.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.15.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.21.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.25.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.31.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7 3.10.0-1160.41.1.el7 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7 Modifications: None Kpatch-MR: https://gitlab.com/kpatch-dev/rhel-7/-/merge_requests/8 Approved-by: Artem Savkov (@artem.savkov) Approved-by: Joe Lawrence (@joe.lawrence) Approved-by: Yannick Cote (@ycote1) Z-MR: https://gitlab.com/redhat/rhel/src/kernel/rhel-7/-/merge_requests/274 No reproducer available, tested via manual install and: KT0 test PASS (ppc64le only): https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/jobs/5809981 for scratch build: https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=39840849 commit e1b729d6d332cc22fe641edc723324222096bf29 Author: Jon Maloy Date: Thu Aug 12 19:22:51 2021 -0400 KVM: PPC: Book3S: Fix H_RTAS rets buffer overflow Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1988218 Upstream Status: Merged Build Info: https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/taskinfo?taskID=39246436 CVE: CVE-2021-37576 commit f62f3c20647ebd5fb6ecb8f0b477b9281c44c10a Author: Nicholas Piggin Date: Tue Jul 20 20:43:09 2021 +1000 KVM: PPC: Book3S: Fix H_RTAS rets buffer overflow The kvmppc_rtas_hcall() sets the host rtas_args.rets pointer based on the rtas_args.nargs that was provided by the guest. That guest nargs value is not range checked, so the guest can cause the host rets pointer to be pointed outside the args array. The individual rtas function handlers check the nargs and nrets values to ensure they are correct, but if they are not, the handlers store a -3 (0xfffffffd) failure indication in rets[0] which corrupts host memory. Fix this by testing up front whether the guest supplied nargs and nret would exceed the array size, and fail the hcall directly without storing a failure indication to rets[0]. Also expand on a comment about why we kill the guest and try not to return errors directly if we have a valid rets[0] pointer. Fixes: 8e591cb72047 ("KVM: PPC: Book3S: Add infrastructure to implement kernel-side RTAS calls") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.10+ Reported-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy Signed-off-by: Joel Savitz --- arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c index ef27fbd5d9c5..d896c6854abc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_rtas.c @@ -230,6 +230,17 @@ int kvmppc_rtas_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * value so we can restore it on the way out. */ orig_rets = args.rets; + if (be32_to_cpu(args.nargs) >= ARRAY_SIZE(args.args)) { + /* + * Don't overflow our args array: ensure there is room for + * at least rets[0] (even if the call specifies 0 nret). + * + * Each handler must then check for the correct nargs and nret + * values, but they may always return failure in rets[0]. + */ + rc = -EINVAL; + goto fail; + } args.rets = &args.args[be32_to_cpu(args.nargs)]; mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock); @@ -257,9 +268,17 @@ int kvmppc_rtas_hcall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) fail: /* * We only get here if the guest has called RTAS with a bogus - * args pointer. That means we can't get to the args, and so we - * can't fail the RTAS call. So fail right out to userspace, - * which should kill the guest. + * args pointer or nargs/nret values that would overflow the + * array. That means we can't get to the args, and so we can't + * fail the RTAS call. So fail right out to userspace, which + * should kill the guest. + * + * SLOF should actually pass the hcall return value from the + * rtas handler call in r3, so enter_rtas could be modified to + * return a failure indication in r3 and we could return such + * errors to the guest rather than failing to host userspace. + * However old guests that don't test for failure could then + * continue silently after errors, so for now we won't do this. */ return rc; } -- 2.26.3