|
 |
f338ef |
From ac216eae4775f7d95877b247937e2a4a4828b1b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
|
|
f338ef |
From: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
|
|
|
f338ef |
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:22:45 +0530
|
|
|
f338ef |
Subject: [PATCH 221/221] protocol/client: propagte GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING only
|
|
|
f338ef |
for connections to brick
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
Two reasons:
|
|
|
f338ef |
* ping responses from glusterd may not be relevant for Halo
|
|
|
f338ef |
replication. Instead, it might be interested in only knowing whether
|
|
|
f338ef |
the brick itself is responsive.
|
|
|
f338ef |
* When a brick is killed, propagating GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING of ping
|
|
|
f338ef |
response from glusterd results in GF_EVENT_DISCONNECT spuriously
|
|
|
f338ef |
propagated to parent xlators. These DISCONNECT events are from the
|
|
|
f338ef |
connections client establishes with glusterd as part of its
|
|
|
f338ef |
reconnect logic. Without GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING, the last event
|
|
|
f338ef |
propagated to parent xlators would be the first DISCONNECT event
|
|
|
f338ef |
from brick and hence subsequent DISCONNECTS to glusterd are not
|
|
|
f338ef |
propagated as protocol/client prevents same event being propagated
|
|
|
f338ef |
to parent xlators consecutively. propagating GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING for
|
|
|
f338ef |
ping responses from glusterd would change the last_sent_event to
|
|
|
f338ef |
GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING and hence protocol/client cannot prevent
|
|
|
f338ef |
subsequent DISCONNECT events
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
>Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
|
|
|
f338ef |
>Fixes: bz#1716979
|
|
|
f338ef |
>Change-Id: I50276680c52f05ca9e12149a3094923622d6eaef
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
Upstream Patch: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22821/
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
BUG: 1703423
|
|
|
f338ef |
Change-Id: I50276680c52f05ca9e12149a3094923622d6eaef
|
|
|
f338ef |
Signed-off-by: Sunil Kumar Acharya <sheggodu@redhat.com>
|
|
|
f338ef |
Reviewed-on: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/174883
|
|
|
f338ef |
Tested-by: RHGS Build Bot <nigelb@redhat.com>
|
|
|
f338ef |
---
|
|
|
f338ef |
xlators/protocol/client/src/client.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
|
|
|
f338ef |
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
diff --git a/xlators/protocol/client/src/client.c b/xlators/protocol/client/src/client.c
|
|
|
f338ef |
index a372807..95e4be5 100644
|
|
|
f338ef |
--- a/xlators/protocol/client/src/client.c
|
|
|
f338ef |
+++ b/xlators/protocol/client/src/client.c
|
|
|
f338ef |
@@ -2276,6 +2276,12 @@ client_mark_fd_bad(xlator_t *this)
|
|
|
f338ef |
return 0;
|
|
|
f338ef |
}
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
+static int
|
|
|
f338ef |
+is_connection_to_brick(struct rpc_clnt *rpc)
|
|
|
f338ef |
+{
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ return (rpc->conn.config.remote_port != 0);
|
|
|
f338ef |
+}
|
|
|
f338ef |
+
|
|
|
f338ef |
int
|
|
|
f338ef |
client_rpc_notify(struct rpc_clnt *rpc, void *mydata, rpc_clnt_event_t event,
|
|
|
f338ef |
void *data)
|
|
|
f338ef |
@@ -2297,10 +2303,12 @@ client_rpc_notify(struct rpc_clnt *rpc, void *mydata, rpc_clnt_event_t event,
|
|
|
f338ef |
|
|
|
f338ef |
switch (event) {
|
|
|
f338ef |
case RPC_CLNT_PING: {
|
|
|
f338ef |
- ret = default_notify(this, GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING, data);
|
|
|
f338ef |
- if (ret)
|
|
|
f338ef |
- gf_log(this->name, GF_LOG_INFO, "CHILD_PING notify failed");
|
|
|
f338ef |
- conf->last_sent_event = GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING;
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ if (is_connection_to_brick(rpc)) {
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ ret = default_notify(this, GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING, data);
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ if (ret)
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ gf_log(this->name, GF_LOG_INFO, "CHILD_PING notify failed");
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ conf->last_sent_event = GF_EVENT_CHILD_PING;
|
|
|
f338ef |
+ }
|
|
|
f338ef |
break;
|
|
|
f338ef |
}
|
|
|
f338ef |
case RPC_CLNT_CONNECT: {
|
|
|
f338ef |
--
|
|
|
f338ef |
1.8.3.1
|
|
|
f338ef |
|