d1681e
From 684f7a9f2f6d79ac45fdf2cf994c5fca139e51cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
d1681e
From: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
d1681e
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:10:46 +0530
d1681e
Subject: [PATCH 178/180] cluster/ec: Do lock conflict check correctly for
d1681e
 wait-list
d1681e
d1681e
Problem:
d1681e
ec_link_has_lock_conflict() is traversing over only owner_list
d1681e
but the function is also getting called with wait_list.
d1681e
d1681e
Fix:
d1681e
Modify ec_link_has_lock_conflict() to traverse lists correctly.
d1681e
Updated the callers to reflect the changes.
d1681e
d1681e
 >BUG: 1540896
d1681e
 >Change-Id: Ibd7ea10f4498e7c2761f9a6faac6d5cb7d750c91
d1681e
 >Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
d1681e
d1681e
Master Patch: https://review.gluster.org/19415
d1681e
Release-3.13 Patch: https://review.gluster.org/19428
d1681e
d1681e
BUG: 1540908
d1681e
Change-Id: I859aab86d591c22d635bf7a2ef17b77b605d32d8
d1681e
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
d1681e
Reviewed-on: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/129249
d1681e
Tested-by: RHGS Build Bot <nigelb@redhat.com>
d1681e
Reviewed-by: Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <sheggodu@redhat.com>
d1681e
---
d1681e
 xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
d1681e
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
d1681e
d1681e
diff --git a/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c b/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
d1681e
index 051fff6..bd2ae50 100644
d1681e
--- a/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
d1681e
+++ b/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
d1681e
@@ -1643,18 +1643,27 @@ ec_lock_update_fd(ec_lock_t *lock, ec_fop_data_t *fop)
d1681e
 }
d1681e
 
d1681e
 static gf_boolean_t
d1681e
-ec_link_has_lock_conflict (ec_lock_link_t *link, struct list_head *owners)
d1681e
+ec_link_has_lock_conflict (ec_lock_link_t *link, gf_boolean_t waitlist_check)
d1681e
 {
d1681e
-        ec_lock_link_t *owner_link = NULL;
d1681e
+        ec_lock_link_t *trav_link = NULL;
d1681e
         ec_t           *ec = link->fop->xl->private;
d1681e
 
d1681e
         if (!ec->parallel_writes)
d1681e
                 return _gf_true;
d1681e
 
d1681e
-        list_for_each_entry (owner_link, owners, owner_list) {
d1681e
-                if (ec_lock_conflict (owner_link, link))
d1681e
+        list_for_each_entry (trav_link, &link->lock->owners, owner_list) {
d1681e
+                if (ec_lock_conflict (trav_link, link))
d1681e
                         return _gf_true;
d1681e
         }
d1681e
+
d1681e
+        if (!waitlist_check)
d1681e
+                return _gf_false;
d1681e
+
d1681e
+        list_for_each_entry (trav_link, &link->lock->waiting, wait_list) {
d1681e
+                if (ec_lock_conflict (trav_link, link))
d1681e
+                        return _gf_true;
d1681e
+        }
d1681e
+
d1681e
         return _gf_false;
d1681e
 }
d1681e
 
d1681e
@@ -1676,7 +1685,7 @@ ec_lock_wake_shared(ec_lock_t *lock, struct list_head *list)
d1681e
 
d1681e
         /* If the fop is not shareable, only this fop can be assigned as owner.
d1681e
          * Other fops will need to wait until this one finishes. */
d1681e
-        if (ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->owners)) {
d1681e
+        if (ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, _gf_false)) {
d1681e
             conflict = _gf_true;
d1681e
         }
d1681e
 
d1681e
@@ -1923,9 +1932,7 @@ ec_lock_assign_owner(ec_lock_link_t *link)
d1681e
          * owners, or waiters(to prevent starvation).
d1681e
          * Otherwise we need to wait.
d1681e
          */
d1681e
-        if (!lock->acquired ||
d1681e
-            ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->owners) ||
d1681e
-            ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->waiting)) {
d1681e
+        if (!lock->acquired || ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, _gf_true)) {
d1681e
             ec_trace("LOCK_QUEUE_WAIT", fop, "lock=%p", lock);
d1681e
 
d1681e
             list_add_tail(&link->wait_list, &lock->waiting);
d1681e
-- 
d1681e
1.8.3.1
d1681e