a3470f
From 684f7a9f2f6d79ac45fdf2cf994c5fca139e51cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
a3470f
From: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
a3470f
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:10:46 +0530
a3470f
Subject: [PATCH 178/180] cluster/ec: Do lock conflict check correctly for
a3470f
 wait-list
a3470f
a3470f
Problem:
a3470f
ec_link_has_lock_conflict() is traversing over only owner_list
a3470f
but the function is also getting called with wait_list.
a3470f
a3470f
Fix:
a3470f
Modify ec_link_has_lock_conflict() to traverse lists correctly.
a3470f
Updated the callers to reflect the changes.
a3470f
a3470f
 >BUG: 1540896
a3470f
 >Change-Id: Ibd7ea10f4498e7c2761f9a6faac6d5cb7d750c91
a3470f
 >Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
a3470f
a3470f
Master Patch: https://review.gluster.org/19415
a3470f
Release-3.13 Patch: https://review.gluster.org/19428
a3470f
a3470f
BUG: 1540908
a3470f
Change-Id: I859aab86d591c22d635bf7a2ef17b77b605d32d8
a3470f
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
a3470f
Reviewed-on: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/129249
a3470f
Tested-by: RHGS Build Bot <nigelb@redhat.com>
a3470f
Reviewed-by: Sunil Kumar Heggodu Gopala Acharya <sheggodu@redhat.com>
a3470f
---
a3470f
 xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
a3470f
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
a3470f
a3470f
diff --git a/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c b/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
a3470f
index 051fff6..bd2ae50 100644
a3470f
--- a/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
a3470f
+++ b/xlators/cluster/ec/src/ec-common.c
a3470f
@@ -1643,18 +1643,27 @@ ec_lock_update_fd(ec_lock_t *lock, ec_fop_data_t *fop)
a3470f
 }
a3470f
 
a3470f
 static gf_boolean_t
a3470f
-ec_link_has_lock_conflict (ec_lock_link_t *link, struct list_head *owners)
a3470f
+ec_link_has_lock_conflict (ec_lock_link_t *link, gf_boolean_t waitlist_check)
a3470f
 {
a3470f
-        ec_lock_link_t *owner_link = NULL;
a3470f
+        ec_lock_link_t *trav_link = NULL;
a3470f
         ec_t           *ec = link->fop->xl->private;
a3470f
 
a3470f
         if (!ec->parallel_writes)
a3470f
                 return _gf_true;
a3470f
 
a3470f
-        list_for_each_entry (owner_link, owners, owner_list) {
a3470f
-                if (ec_lock_conflict (owner_link, link))
a3470f
+        list_for_each_entry (trav_link, &link->lock->owners, owner_list) {
a3470f
+                if (ec_lock_conflict (trav_link, link))
a3470f
                         return _gf_true;
a3470f
         }
a3470f
+
a3470f
+        if (!waitlist_check)
a3470f
+                return _gf_false;
a3470f
+
a3470f
+        list_for_each_entry (trav_link, &link->lock->waiting, wait_list) {
a3470f
+                if (ec_lock_conflict (trav_link, link))
a3470f
+                        return _gf_true;
a3470f
+        }
a3470f
+
a3470f
         return _gf_false;
a3470f
 }
a3470f
 
a3470f
@@ -1676,7 +1685,7 @@ ec_lock_wake_shared(ec_lock_t *lock, struct list_head *list)
a3470f
 
a3470f
         /* If the fop is not shareable, only this fop can be assigned as owner.
a3470f
          * Other fops will need to wait until this one finishes. */
a3470f
-        if (ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->owners)) {
a3470f
+        if (ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, _gf_false)) {
a3470f
             conflict = _gf_true;
a3470f
         }
a3470f
 
a3470f
@@ -1923,9 +1932,7 @@ ec_lock_assign_owner(ec_lock_link_t *link)
a3470f
          * owners, or waiters(to prevent starvation).
a3470f
          * Otherwise we need to wait.
a3470f
          */
a3470f
-        if (!lock->acquired ||
a3470f
-            ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->owners) ||
a3470f
-            ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, &lock->waiting)) {
a3470f
+        if (!lock->acquired || ec_link_has_lock_conflict (link, _gf_true)) {
a3470f
             ec_trace("LOCK_QUEUE_WAIT", fop, "lock=%p", lock);
a3470f
 
a3470f
             list_add_tail(&link->wait_list, &lock->waiting);
a3470f
-- 
a3470f
1.8.3.1
a3470f