Blame SOURCES/gdb-follow-child-stale-parent.patch

01917d
Problem occurs with python and its get_current_arch () as it selects
01917d
selected_frame and current_frame while still inferior_ptid is valid for the
01917d
original parent.  But since this place it is already attached and later
01917d
unwinders try to access it, breaking:
01917d
  -PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the first fork
01917d
  -PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: watchpoint after the first fork
01917d
  -PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the second fork
01917d
  -PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: watchpoint after the second fork
01917d
  -PASS: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: finish
01917d
  +FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the first fork
01917d
  +FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: watchpoint after the first fork
01917d
  +FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: breakpoint after the second fork
01917d
  +FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: watchpoint after the second fork
01917d
  +FAIL: gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp: child: singlethreaded: finish
01917d
01917d
--- ./gdb/infrun.c	2009-12-21 20:26:30.000000000 +0100
01917d
+++ ./gdb/infrun.c	2009-12-21 20:26:11.000000000 +0100
01917d
@@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ follow_fork (void)
01917d
 	  }
01917d
 	else
01917d
 	  {
01917d
+	    /* Possibly referenced PARENT is no longer valid.  */
01917d
+	    reinit_frame_cache ();
01917d
+
01917d
 	    /* This pending follow fork event is now handled, one way
01917d
 	       or another.  The previous selected thread may be gone
01917d
 	       from the lists by now, but if it is still around, need