85359c
diff -Nrup a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
85359c
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c	2018-01-03 16:10:46.278171086 -0700
85359c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c	2018-01-03 16:12:32.022220166 -0700
85359c
@@ -9862,14 +9862,13 @@ static void
85359c
 ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash (const HOST_WIDE_INT size)
85359c
 {
85359c
   struct machine_function *m = cfun->machine;
85359c
+  struct ix86_frame frame;
85359c
+  ix86_compute_frame_layout (&frame);
85359c
 
85359c
   /* If this function does not statically allocate stack space, then
85359c
      no probes are needed.  */
85359c
   if (!size)
85359c
     {
85359c
-      struct ix86_frame frame;
85359c
-      ix86_compute_frame_layout (&frame);
85359c
-
85359c
       /* However, the allocation of space via pushes for register
85359c
 	 saves could be viewed as allocating space, but without the
85359c
 	 need to probe.  */
85359c
@@ -9888,21 +9887,40 @@ ix86_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash
85359c
      pointer could be anywhere in the guard page.  The safe thing
85359c
      to do is emit a probe now.
85359c
 
85359c
+     The probe can be avoided if we have already emitted any callee
85359c
+     register saves into the stack or have a frame pointer (which will
85359c
+     have been saved as well).  Those saves will function as implicit
85359c
+     probes.
85359c
+
85359c
      ?!? This should be revamped to work like aarch64 and s390 where
85359c
      we track the offset from the most recent probe.  Normally that
85359c
      offset would be zero.  For a non-return function we would reset
85359c
      it to PROBE_INTERVAL - (STACK_BOUNDARY / BITS_PER_UNIT).   Then
85359c
      we just probe when we cross PROBE_INTERVAL.  */
85359c
-  if (TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (cfun->decl))
85359c
+  if (TREE_THIS_VOLATILE (cfun->decl)
85359c
+      && !(frame.nregs || frame.nsseregs || frame_pointer_needed))
85359c
+
85359c
     {
85359c
       /* We can safely use any register here since we're just going to push
85359c
 	 its value and immediately pop it back.  But we do try and avoid
85359c
 	 argument passing registers so as not to introduce dependencies in
85359c
 	 the pipeline.  For 32 bit we use %esi and for 64 bit we use %rax.  */
85359c
       rtx dummy_reg = gen_rtx_REG (word_mode, TARGET_64BIT ? AX_REG : SI_REG);
85359c
-      rtx insn = emit_insn (gen_push (dummy_reg));
85359c
-      RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn) = 1;
85359c
-      ix86_emit_restore_reg_using_pop (dummy_reg);
85359c
+      rtx insn_push = emit_insn (gen_push (dummy_reg));
85359c
+      rtx insn_pop = emit_insn (gen_pop (dummy_reg));
85359c
+      m->fs.sp_offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD;
85359c
+      if (m->fs.cfa_reg == stack_pointer_rtx)
85359c
+	{
85359c
+	  m->fs.cfa_offset -= UNITS_PER_WORD;
85359c
+	  rtx x = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, -UNITS_PER_WORD);
85359c
+	  x = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx, x);
85359c
+	  add_reg_note (insn_push, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA, x);
85359c
+	  RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn_push) = 1;
85359c
+	  x = plus_constant (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, UNITS_PER_WORD);
85359c
+	  x = gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, stack_pointer_rtx, x);
85359c
+	  add_reg_note (insn_pop, REG_CFA_ADJUST_CFA, x);
85359c
+	  RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P (insn_pop) = 1;
85359c
+	}
85359c
       emit_insn (gen_blockage ());
85359c
     }
85359c
 
85359c
 
85359c
diff -Nrup a/gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-12.c b/gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-12.c
85359c
--- gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-12.c	2018-01-03 15:42:40.849530670 -0700
85359c
+++ gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-12.c	2018-01-03 15:36:12.528488596 -0700
85359c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ __attribute__ ((noreturn)) void exit (in
85359c
 __attribute__ ((noreturn)) void
85359c
 f (void)
85359c
 {
85359c
-  asm volatile ("nop" ::: "edi");
85359c
   exit (1);
85359c
 }
85359c
 
85359c
diff -Nrup a/gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c b/gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c
85359c
--- gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c	1969-12-31 17:00:00.000000000 -0700
85359c
+++ gcc-4.8.5-20150702/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c	2018-01-03 15:36:12.528488596 -0700
85359c
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
85359c
+/* { dg-do compile } */
85359c
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -mtune=generic -fomit-frame-pointer" } */
85359c
+/* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection } */
85359c
+
85359c
+
85359c
+int x0, x1;
85359c
+void f1 (void);
85359c
+void f2 (int, int);
85359c
+
85359c
+__attribute__ ((noreturn))
85359c
+void
85359c
+f3 (void)
85359c
+{ 
85359c
+  int y0 = x0;
85359c
+  int y1 = x1;
85359c
+  f1 ();
85359c
+  f2 (y0, y1);
85359c
+  while (1);
85359c
+}
85359c
+
85359c
+/* Verify no explicit probes.  */
85359c
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "or\[ql\]" } } */
85359c
+
85359c
+/* We also want to verify we did not use a push/pop sequence
85359c
+   to probe *sp as the callee register saves are sufficient
85359c
+   to probe *sp.
85359c
+
85359c
+   y0/y1 are live across the call and thus must be allocated
85359c
+   into either a stack slot or callee saved register.  The former
85359c
+   would be rather dumb.  So assume it does not happen.
85359c
+
85359c
+   So search for two/four pushes for the callee register saves/argument
85359c
+   pushes and no pops (since the function has no reachable epilogue).  */
85359c
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "push\[ql\]" 2 { target { ! ia32 } } } }  */
85359c
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "push\[ql\]" 4 { target { ia32 } } } }  */
85359c
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "pop" } } */
85359c
+