Blame SOURCES/0019-Try-even-harder-to-convince-coverity-that-get_file-i.patch

da1a85
From 576b89de7d1a49d64efab9d494eeea5a296bdccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
da1a85
From: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
da1a85
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 12:23:20 -0400
da1a85
Subject: [PATCH 19/24] Try even harder to convince coverity that get_file
da1a85
 isn't leaking memory...
da1a85
da1a85
Signed-off-by: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
da1a85
---
da1a85
 src/util.h | 7 +++++++
da1a85
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
da1a85
da1a85
diff --git a/src/util.h b/src/util.h
da1a85
index ef85a4c277e..441ced84fcf 100644
da1a85
--- a/src/util.h
da1a85
+++ b/src/util.h
da1a85
@@ -332,6 +332,13 @@ get_file(uint8_t **result, const char * const fmt, ...)
da1a85
         errno = error;
da1a85
 
da1a85
         if (rc < 0 || bufsize < 1) {
da1a85
+                /*
da1a85
+                 * I don't think this can happen, but I can't convince
da1a85
+                 * cov-scan
da1a85
+                 */
da1a85
+                if (buf)
da1a85
+                        free(buf);
da1a85
+                *result = NULL;
da1a85
                 efi_error("could not read file \"%s\"", path);
da1a85
                 return -1;
da1a85
         }
da1a85
-- 
da1a85
2.17.1
da1a85